So I just came back from a seminar presentation, and I was bothered by the criticism I received.
Let's make this clear. I'm used to receiving criticism. Being a student as well as an artist means that there will always be people who disagree with me or attempt to correct me at every instance. I have received very, very harsh criticism before and I know I can take it.
I think what disturbed me here was that my critics weren't completely negative. In fact, they also made sure to add that I had done a good job. The issue was that they went into the details of what I had done wrong, but when it came to complimenting me they fell back on extremely general terms such as "excellent."
Artists are always asking for constructive criticism, or well thought-out analyses of what elements in their pieces were not as good as they could have been. However, implicit in the request for constructive criticism is a call for constructive complimenting as well. While I like to know what I did badly so I can change it, I'd also like to know what I did right so I can maintain it in my next attempt. The idea for constructive commentary is that enough details be given so that they can actually be acted on.
From today's seminar, I certainly have an idea of what not to do. But as for what I should do again? Not a clue. And because my compliments were not as constructive as the criticism, I got the sneaking suspicion that those positive comments were lacking in sincerity.
So if you ever comment on something? Be constructive with both the good and the bad. A more detailed opinion is always better, and your reviewee will thank you for it.
